December 2010 Poll: Difference between revisions

From Freegle Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
[http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll]  
[http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll]  


Poll announcement: [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreegleUK-Central/message/17925]


'''Document Links'''  
'''Document Links'''  
Line 28: Line 29:
Returning Officer [mailto:returningofficer@ilovefreegle.org returningofficer@ilovefreegle.org]
Returning Officer [mailto:returningofficer@ilovefreegle.org returningofficer@ilovefreegle.org]


====Results====
Announced on Central, message no.18606 [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreegleUK-Central/message/18606]
With 111 confirmed voters participating, the results of the recent National Poll
regarding Acceptance of Documents and National Volunteers were as follows
'''Q1/ Financial Management and Controls'''<br>
For 93 (84%)<br>
Against 3<br>
Abstain 15<br>
therefore this document is accepted as written<br>
'''Q2/ Freegle Reps role and remit'''<br>
For 99 (89%)<br>
Against 3<br>
Abstain 9<br>
therefore this document is accepted as written<br>
'''Q3/ Election and Poll Procedures'''<br>
For 102 (92%)<br>
Against 0<br>
Abstain 9<br>
therefore this document is accepted as written<br>
'''Q4/ Freegle Working Groups role and remit'''<br>
For 96 (86%)<br>
Against 4<br>
Abstain 11<br>
therefore this document is accepted as written<br>
'''Q5/ National Volunteers'''<br>
Can Freegle have members (with voting rights, rights to membership of central
groups and ability to stand for elected positions) who are not volunteers or
moderators on a local affiliated group, but who volunteer at a national level?
The precise details of how this would work will be developed by the Structure
Group.
<br>
For 65 (61%)<br>
Against 27<br>
Abstain 14<br>
No Answer 5<br>
therefore the majority of Freegle members agree to the principles of having National Volunteers but Structure must now develop the precise details of how this will work.
There were a variety of Comments left, which are available for perusal on Structure (Message #7004)
Thank you to everyone who took part, your input as volunteers is very much appreciated.
Ray Owen
Returning Officer





Latest revision as of 13:02, 14 October 2011

December 2010 Poll

Poll link: http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll

Poll announcement: [1]

Document Links

These are the documents we would like you to read;

Finance Management and Controls  http://freegle.it/ProposedFinanceDoc

Freegle Reps Role and Remit  http://freegle.it/ProposedRepsRoleRemitDoc

Election and Poll Procedures  http://freegle.it/ProposedElectionAndPollProcedures

Freegle Working Groups Role and Remit  http://freegle.it/ProposedWorkingGroupsDoc


Questions

If you have questions on any of the above documents, please raise them with one of the following;

Central http://freegle.it/Central or

Structure Group http://freegle.it/Structure or

Returning Officer returningofficer@ilovefreegle.org


Results

Announced on Central, message no.18606 [2]

With 111 confirmed voters participating, the results of the recent National Poll regarding Acceptance of Documents and National Volunteers were as follows

Q1/ Financial Management and Controls
For 93 (84%)
Against 3
Abstain 15
therefore this document is accepted as written

Q2/ Freegle Reps role and remit
For 99 (89%)
Against 3
Abstain 9
therefore this document is accepted as written

Q3/ Election and Poll Procedures
For 102 (92%)
Against 0
Abstain 9
therefore this document is accepted as written

Q4/ Freegle Working Groups role and remit
For 96 (86%)
Against 4
Abstain 11
therefore this document is accepted as written

Q5/ National Volunteers

Can Freegle have members (with voting rights, rights to membership of central groups and ability to stand for elected positions) who are not volunteers or moderators on a local affiliated group, but who volunteer at a national level? The precise details of how this would work will be developed by the Structure Group.
For 65 (61%)
Against 27
Abstain 14
No Answer 5
therefore the majority of Freegle members agree to the principles of having National Volunteers but Structure must now develop the precise details of how this will work.

There were a variety of Comments left, which are available for perusal on Structure (Message #7004)

Thank you to everyone who took part, your input as volunteers is very much appreciated.

Ray Owen Returning Officer


Back to Polls