December 2010 Poll: Difference between revisions
m (Protected "December 2010 Poll" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll] | [http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll] | ||
Poll announcement: [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreegleUK-Central/message/17925] | |||
'''Document Links''' | '''Document Links''' | ||
Line 60: | Line 61: | ||
'''Q5/ National Volunteers'''<br> | '''Q5/ National Volunteers'''<br> | ||
Can Freegle have members (with voting rights, rights to membership of central | |||
groups and ability to stand for elected positions) who are not volunteers or | |||
moderators on a local affiliated group, but who volunteer at a national level? | |||
The precise details of how this would work will be developed by the Structure | |||
Group. | |||
<br> | |||
For 65 (61%)<br> | For 65 (61%)<br> | ||
Against 27<br> | Against 27<br> |
Latest revision as of 13:02, 14 October 2011
December 2010 Poll
Poll link: http://freegle.it/Dec2010DocumentAdoptionPoll
Poll announcement: [1]
Document Links
These are the documents we would like you to read;
Finance Management and Controls http://freegle.it/ProposedFinanceDoc
Freegle Reps Role and Remit http://freegle.it/ProposedRepsRoleRemitDoc
Election and Poll Procedures http://freegle.it/ProposedElectionAndPollProcedures
Freegle Working Groups Role and Remit http://freegle.it/ProposedWorkingGroupsDoc
Questions
If you have questions on any of the above documents, please raise them with one of the following;
Central http://freegle.it/Central or
Structure Group http://freegle.it/Structure or
Returning Officer returningofficer@ilovefreegle.org
Results
Announced on Central, message no.18606 [2]
With 111 confirmed voters participating, the results of the recent National Poll regarding Acceptance of Documents and National Volunteers were as follows
Q1/ Financial Management and Controls
For 93 (84%)
Against 3
Abstain 15
therefore this document is accepted as written
Q2/ Freegle Reps role and remit
For 99 (89%)
Against 3
Abstain 9
therefore this document is accepted as written
Q3/ Election and Poll Procedures
For 102 (92%)
Against 0
Abstain 9
therefore this document is accepted as written
Q4/ Freegle Working Groups role and remit
For 96 (86%)
Against 4
Abstain 11
therefore this document is accepted as written
Q5/ National Volunteers
Can Freegle have members (with voting rights, rights to membership of central
groups and ability to stand for elected positions) who are not volunteers or
moderators on a local affiliated group, but who volunteer at a national level?
The precise details of how this would work will be developed by the Structure
Group.
For 65 (61%)
Against 27
Abstain 14
No Answer 5
therefore the majority of Freegle members agree to the principles of having National Volunteers but Structure must now develop the precise details of how this will work.
There were a variety of Comments left, which are available for perusal on Structure (Message #7004)
Thank you to everyone who took part, your input as volunteers is very much appreciated.
Ray Owen Returning Officer
Back to Polls