Pre-approving Members: Difference between revisions

From Freegle Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 15: Line 15:




===Cons of open membership:===
===Cons of closed membership:===
* It is an unnecessary barrier for people who wish to freegle.
* It is an unnecessary barrier for people who wish to freegle.
* It makes more work for the moderators.
* It makes more work for the moderators.

Latest revision as of 11:30, 15 Mayıs 2018

The best option to make Freegling accessible and attractive to new people is to have open membership.


Pros of open membership:

  • Members can get posting immediately
    • they may be joining to get rid of stuff in a hurry
    • the internet is an instant thing so demonstrating how to be an active Freegler from the first few clicks to the site is essential.
  • Saves moderators time.
  • Gives moderators more time to spend promoting the group and engaging with members in a positive way.
  • More potential members will join because the joining process is much easier.
  • Members don't have to reply to a joining email, which means they won't be lost somewhere in the joining process.
  • Applicants won't be discouraged by what they see as intrusive questions.
  • Moderators don't have to send out reminders.


Cons of closed membership:

  • It is an unnecessary barrier for people who wish to freegle.
  • It makes more work for the moderators.
  • Members often don't reply to a joining email, so groups are losing potential members.
  • The more complex the joining process is, the more potential members will be put off joining.
  • People might not like or be suspicious of being asked questions.
  • Spammers might join anyway, so moderators could be just wasting their precious time.



Back to: Other bits and bobs or How to or Admin